Sad about the 1100 ADV…………….

[Anonymous]

#3679

Must have summat to do with power to weight.http://is.gd/1q2MKALess power, shorter wait. ;D

[Dave Ross]

#15255

Still waiting to see the 1100 Adventure….

[Russell Taylor]

#15256

Yes, and the 800R would have used far less gas too.Humbug

[Anonymous]

#15257

OK, another typo: but 1200 gets dusted by 800 sounds worse anyway: carting all that ugly fat……………

[Dave Ross]

#15258

Yes, you guys are right. No let's do the same thing again. This time down a gravel road, with some corners thrown in and with full panniers on every bike.

[Jim Young]

#15259

OK, another typo: but 1200 gets dusted by 800 sounds worse anyway: carting all that ugly fat...............

But you all know the 1200Gs is beautiful  8)

[Richard Kuysten]

#15260

Are things a bit quiet out your way Bruce  ;D

[Anonymous]

#15261

Are things a bit quiet out your way Bruce  ;D

I'm having motorsickle withdrawal syndrome, that's all.

[Anonymous]

#15262

Yes, you guys are right. No let's do the same thing again. This time down a gravel road, with some corners thrown in and with full panniers on every bike.

Horses for courses! I don't think (true!), the RR had full panniers and gravel as primary design criteria. Beached whales such as my touring R1150RT are not really drag bikes either. Power to weight, eh Bwucie?

[Author]

Posts